All a matter of integrity despite the mode of delivery
Author: Emeritus Professor Greg Whateley
I have long held the view that the mode of delivery should have options for students. I also hold the view that online learning and teaching is just as effective as face-to-face delivery – and perhaps a hybrid approach is the best option of all. Each mode has its challenges – and these need to be met head on. No single mode is superior.
In a recent article by Tom Winkler (14.02.205 Future Campus) – Online integrity under microscope – the issue was reported that the national regulator of higher education courses raised the possibility of distinguishing between online programs and face to face programs on actual testamurs – implying that the online option was of lesser importance given the reliance on online assessment – and a ‘warning’ might be advisable. Winkler went on to stress that it was a provocation rather than a statement.
This sort of thinking is in response to concerns about generative AI – which does not confine itself to online courses.
Post COVID (if we can be bold enough to suggest it is over) the notion of blended learning/hybrid learning being somehow inferior to face-to-face learning is somewhat questionable. In truth a small revolution took place that enabled the sector to rethink the way we do things – and look at alternatives. Put simply, the tired lecture theatre/tutorial approach was not exactly ideal.
The key question is about academic integrity – and how to maintain it – whether online F2F or blended (hybrid).
Balanced assessment
I have always argued in favour of a shift from examination halls to a more balanced approach to assessment. Certainly, the academic integrity issue is always with us – but we need to understand that invigilation (in its many forms) remains a genuine option – online is no exception.
See - Biggest HE challenges for 2025-26: Opinion | Campus Review
Hybrid learning
The most effective approach has been a hybrid solution. This means that online classes can be delivered live from anywhere – and my own experience has been that it is well received and supported by students. A mix of F2F and online may possibly be the solution for those overly concerned about integrity and the inappropriate use of AI.
See - Student satisfaction shows why hybrid learning is here to stay: opinion | Campus Review
The new normal
We have created a new environment – whether we like it or not – that requires us to embrace the new technology, consider the possibilities of online delivery – and most importantly provide options for our students.
See - Is the new normal here to stay? – opinion | Campus Review
The very notion of undermining online delivery is unacceptable. The idea of somehow augmenting the importance of F2F learning is questionable. The real challenge is maintaining academic integrity in a range of modes – and achieving the learning and graduate outcomes. Some form of invigilation may ease the concern.
Emeritus Professor Greg Whateley is Chief Executive Officer and Executive Dean at the Australian Guild of Education. He is currently Chair of the InvigilatorPlus Advisory Board.
